伟大的
正如我所提到的，这种行为是意料之中的。由于两个时期的PWMs是相同的。每次触发时，PWM计数器仍在运行（最后一次计数），它忽略了触发器（因为只有在计数器停止时才开始注册/使用）。通过缩短“1”的周期，确保PWM停止并接受下一个启动触发器。
祝您的设计好运，如果您遇到任何障碍，我们将乐于助人。
以上来自于百度翻译
以下为原文
Great
As I mentioned, the behavior is expected. Since the period of both the PWMs are same. By the time every other start is triggered, the PWM counter is still running (on the last count) and it ignores the trigger (as start is registered/used only when counter is stopped). By reducing the period by '1' makes sure the PWM stops and accepts the next start trigger.
Good luck for your design and we will be glad to assist, if you stumble upon any hurdles
伟大的
正如我所提到的，这种行为是意料之中的。由于两个时期的PWMs是相同的。每次触发时，PWM计数器仍在运行（最后一次计数），它忽略了触发器（因为只有在计数器停止时才开始注册/使用）。通过缩短“1”的周期，确保PWM停止并接受下一个启动触发器。
祝您的设计好运，如果您遇到任何障碍，我们将乐于助人。
以上来自于百度翻译
以下为原文
Great
As I mentioned, the behavior is expected. Since the period of both the PWMs are same. By the time every other start is triggered, the PWM counter is still running (on the last count) and it ignores the trigger (as start is registered/used only when counter is stopped). By reducing the period by '1' makes sure the PWM stops and accepts the next start trigger.
Good luck for your design and we will be glad to assist, if you stumble upon any hurdles
举报
