由于许多文档提到“这只有STM32F4xx作为处理器”，我认为这意味着支持所有或许多4xx系列。但事实上，在FOC SDK的发行说明中有一个“支持的处理器”，它提到了一些特定的F4xx处理器而没有别的。
这是一个MC gui限制还是在F405和F411之间有足够的差异，FOC库的核心（没有来源）需要改变？
从它在F3xx上运行的事实来看，72MHz显然已经足够了。 F411可以做得更好。库和外围设备之间是否存在需要更改的硬编码交互？
（我愿意尝试手动修改MC gui生成的头文件，只要你说它有合理的成功机会......）
附：该william hill官网
有一个错误：在编辑帖子后，它不会崩溃“引用的消息”。
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
As lots of documentation referred to ''this is available only with a STM32F4xx as processor'', I took that to mean that all or many of the 4xx family were supported. But indeed there is a ''supported processors'' in the release notes of the FOC SDK that mentions a few specific F4xx processors and nothing else.
Is this an MC gui restriction or are there enough differences between F405 and say F411 that the core of the FOC library (no source) needs to be changed?
From the fact that it runs on F3xx, 72MHz is apparently enough. F411 can do better. Are there hardcoded interactions between the library and peripherals that need changing?
(I'm willing to attempt manually modifying the header files that MC gui produces, provided that you say that it has a reasonable chance of success....)
P.S. The forum has a bug: it will not collapse the ''quoted messages'' after an edit of a post.
由于许多文档提到“这只有STM32F4xx作为处理器”，我认为这意味着支持所有或许多4xx系列。但事实上，在FOC SDK的发行说明中有一个“支持的处理器”，它提到了一些特定的F4xx处理器而没有别的。
这是一个MC gui限制还是在F405和F411之间有足够的差异，FOC库的核心（没有来源）需要改变？
从它在F3xx上运行的事实来看，72MHz显然已经足够了。 F411可以做得更好。库和外围设备之间是否存在需要更改的硬编码交互？
（我愿意尝试手动修改MC gui生成的头文件，只要你说它有合理的成功机会......）
附：该william hill官网
有一个错误：在编辑帖子后，它不会崩溃“引用的消息”。
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
As lots of documentation referred to ''this is available only with a STM32F4xx as processor'', I took that to mean that all or many of the 4xx family were supported. But indeed there is a ''supported processors'' in the release notes of the FOC SDK that mentions a few specific F4xx processors and nothing else.
Is this an MC gui restriction or are there enough differences between F405 and say F411 that the core of the FOC library (no source) needs to be changed?
From the fact that it runs on F3xx, 72MHz is apparently enough. F411 can do better. Are there hardcoded interactions between the library and peripherals that need changing?
(I'm willing to attempt manually modifying the header files that MC gui produces, provided that you say that it has a reasonable chance of success....)
P.S. The forum has a bug: it will not collapse the ''quoted messages'' after an edit of a post.
举报
