是的,LSM9DS1更敏感,Full Scare也低4高斯,如果LIS2MDL满量程为50高斯。
我不知道车辆经过时磁场干扰有多大,它将取决于许多变量。请注意,磁场中可能存在其他干扰,因此您必须主要区分哪一个是由车辆引起的。就个人而言,我认为你不需要那么高的敏感度。
LSM9DS1仍然是活动产品,因此可以使用它。
无论如何,我会建议你做一些试验,看看你想要分析的磁场的真正价值是什么。
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
Yes, the LSM9DS1 is more sensitive, the Full Scare is also lower 4 gauss, in case LIS2MDL the full scale is 50 gauss.
I don't know how big is the magnetic disturbance when the vehicle passed by, it will be dependent on many variables. Please be aware there might be other disturbances in magnetic field so you will have to mainly distinguish which one is caused by the vehicle. Personally, I think you don't need so high sensitivity.
LSM9DS1 is still active product so it should be OK to use it.
Anyway I would recommend you to do some trials to see what are the real values of the magnetic field which you want to analyze.
是的,LSM9DS1更敏感,Full Scare也低4高斯,如果LIS2MDL满量程为50高斯。
我不知道车辆经过时磁场干扰有多大,它将取决于许多变量。请注意,磁场中可能存在其他干扰,因此您必须主要区分哪一个是由车辆引起的。就个人而言,我认为你不需要那么高的敏感度。
LSM9DS1仍然是活动产品,因此可以使用它。
无论如何,我会建议你做一些试验,看看你想要分析的磁场的真正价值是什么。
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
Yes, the LSM9DS1 is more sensitive, the Full Scare is also lower 4 gauss, in case LIS2MDL the full scale is 50 gauss.
I don't know how big is the magnetic disturbance when the vehicle passed by, it will be dependent on many variables. Please be aware there might be other disturbances in magnetic field so you will have to mainly distinguish which one is caused by the vehicle. Personally, I think you don't need so high sensitivity.
LSM9DS1 is still active product so it should be OK to use it.
Anyway I would recommend you to do some trials to see what are the real values of the magnetic field which you want to analyze.
举报