R，
联系您的Xilinx FAE。
旧的“SEUPI”软件做了类似的事情，“COSMIC”程序进行了数值估算。
“基本位”旨在取代这两种旧工具。
已经做了大量工作来验证其准确性，因此它将所有可能修改功能行为的位标记为必要，而不是标记不改变功能的其他位。
仍然是软件无法确定您的设计功能是否被修改的情况。
一个很好的例子是MicroBlaze（tm）设计中堆栈指针的地址位：如果你从未深入到堆栈中，你永远不会知道地址位是否被破坏。
Austin Lesea主要工程师Xilinx San Jose
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
r,
Contact your Xilinx FAE.
The old "SEUPI" software did something similar, and the "COSMIC" program gave a numerical estimate. The "essential bits" is intended to replace both of those older tools. A great deal of work has been done to verify its accuracy, so it marks all bits that could modify the functional behavior as essential, and not mark other bits which do not change the function.
It is still the case that the software can not determine if the function of your design is modified or not.
A good example is address bit <3> of the stack pointer in a MicroBlaze(tm) design: if you never get that deep in the stack, you would never know that address bit <3> is broken, or not.
Austin Lesea
Principal Engineer
Xilinx San Jose
R，
联系您的Xilinx FAE。
旧的“SEUPI”软件做了类似的事情，“COSMIC”程序进行了数值估算。
“基本位”旨在取代这两种旧工具。
已经做了大量工作来验证其准确性，因此它将所有可能修改功能行为的位标记为必要，而不是标记不改变功能的其他位。
仍然是软件无法确定您的设计功能是否被修改的情况。
一个很好的例子是MicroBlaze（tm）设计中堆栈指针的地址位：如果你从未深入到堆栈中，你永远不会知道地址位是否被破坏。
Austin Lesea主要工程师Xilinx San Jose
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
r,
Contact your Xilinx FAE.
The old "SEUPI" software did something similar, and the "COSMIC" program gave a numerical estimate. The "essential bits" is intended to replace both of those older tools. A great deal of work has been done to verify its accuracy, so it marks all bits that could modify the functional behavior as essential, and not mark other bits which do not change the function.
It is still the case that the software can not determine if the function of your design is modified or not.
A good example is address bit <3> of the stack pointer in a MicroBlaze(tm) design: if you never get that deep in the stack, you would never know that address bit <3> is broken, or not.
Austin Lesea
Principal Engineer
Xilinx San Jose
举报
举报
